According to an influential psychiatrist, trying to find your “true self” is futile, because there’s no such thing


Esto es exacto lo que decía Shah sobre la falta completa de percepción y información acerca de la esencia – Dhat ….

Es obvio que desde el ángulo del Yo Secundario dominante no hay un yo verdadero …

El punto es que este no es realmente nuestro ser y todo el trabajo de Conciencia se basa en liberarse del dominio de este yo adquirido y poder percibir esta Esencia que si somos …

Debe estar muy deprimido este mi amigo!!!! Pero es el síndrome de la arrogancia …

El médico que dice , “no tienes cura ” solo por qué él no conoce la cura , no es diferente a alguien que cree que por qué él no conoce o no percibe el ser entonces el ser no existe ahahahah … Para el seguro que no….

We often confuse our so-called “personality” with who we are. “Just be your self.” How many times have you heard that? You must be born with a certain “personality,” and it’s best to just be natural and play with the personality that you’re given.

In his seminal work on transactional analysis “What Do You Say After You Say Hello”, psychiatrist Dr. Eric Berne explain that personality is fluid, and that it’s a mistake to confuse it with our core identity.

Dr. Eric Berne is an influential psychiatrist and the founder of the modern psychoanalytic therapy called transactional analysis, or TA. TA combines decades of research from famous psychologists such as Freud, Jung, Penfield, Spitz, etc.

Depending on how we’re raised, each person is infused with a “favorite feeling” that he or she likes to play. This can be anger, guilt, inadequacy, righteousness, etc. While all of us experience different feelings, the dominant and “favorite feeling” is played out more than others and “becomes a sort of conditioned reflex which may persist for the rest of his life.”

To illustrate how random and arbitrary our personality development can be, Dr. Berne gives the following example:

“Suppose there is a housing development with 26 houses, and suppose that there is a baby waiting to be born wherever it is that babies wait to be born. The Great Computer in charge of such matters spins a roulette wheel, and the ball falls into slot 17. The Great Computer then announces, ‘The next baby will go to house 17.’ He makes five more spins… so the next five babies go to the houses with those numbers.

Ten years later, each of the children has learned how he is supposed to react. The one in house 17 has learned: “In this family, when the going gets rough, we feel angry.’ The one in house 23 has learned: ‘In this family, when the going gets rough, we feel hurt.’ The babies are 11, 26, and 25 have learned that when the going gets rough their respective families feel guilty, scared, or inadequate. The baby in 31 learns that ‘In this family, when the going gets rough, we find out what to do about it.’”

It should be no surprise to find that the baby born in house 31 will be a “winner” in the sense that the baby learns how to deal with rough situations. The other babies were not so lucky. Dr. Berne argues that the absurd randomness of how we develop personalities should make us think twice about placing due importance on our natural selves. He continues:

“But supposing when the Great Computer made the spins, other numbers had come up, or the same numbers in a different order? Perhaps Baby A, instead of going to 17, would have gone to 11, and learned to cultivate guilt instead of anger, and Baby B, in 23, might have traded places with Baby F in 31. Then instead of Baby B being a loser and Baby F a winner, it would be the other way around.”

Dr. Berne warns us that it’s easy to dismiss people who don’t share our favorite feelings. “Each person in the group is scandalized at the idea that his favored feeling is not a natural, universal, and inevitable response to the situation he meets,” Dr. Berne writes.

People who have “anger” racket become very angry when others tell them to calm down and dismiss their feelings. People in the “hurt” racket become hurt when others tell them to suck it up and dismiss their feelings. And people in the “joy” racket become confused when others don’t share their unrelenting happiness and optimism.

Each person is convinced that his or her own favorite feeling is the most natural one. “The truth is that none of them is natural really;” writes Dr. Berne, “each one has been learned, or rather decided upon, in early child-hood.”



Link original:


Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Salir /  Cambiar )

Google photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google. Salir /  Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Salir /  Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Salir /  Cambiar )

Conectando a %s